Thursday, March 27, 2014

I thought I had to play God


Stop. Look. Listen. Remember those old RR track crossing signs, now extinct? Misinformation, impatience and the power to act decisively can be lethal. In the following personal account, I was attuned to the power of the family 20 Gauge. An intervention beyond my control saved a life. 

A mutt adopted us. It was a red spaniel bird dog mix that appeared one evening without a collar near my wife’s parents’ home just out of Gulfport, Miss. We didn’t feed her that evening. She was there again the next morning, obviously looking for a family. Our family agreed to be adopted.

So we discovered she loved hunting. She was good, pointing and waiting until our signal to flush a quail covey. We didn’t wonder; we just accepted the good luck. She helped us hunting nutria, ‘possums and armadillos, looking for bull snakes and moccasins in Cyprus swamps, fishing in the Gulf, beach combing, and building and paddling pirogues on the bayou. There was plenty for a red longhair bird dog mutt to do. 

But then tragedy happened: she attacked the wrong prey. The first clue was when we were walking to get the mail. We noticed her down the road by the swamp loping in circles and howling. I couldn’t figure out if she caught someone’s stocking cap in her teeth or had an overgrown beard under her chin. That perception changed in a hurry as we approached her. She was sporting a massive cluster of porcupine quills under her chin, in her nose and even her mouth. 

The boys inquired with a neighbor what to do. Let them fester and come out on their own, said the old man. It’s impossible to pull out that many porcupine quills without doing lethal damage.

So I helped my wife’s younger brothers clip them off, a task that still turns my stomach thinking about it. It was tough holding her to clip them off. We hoped she could eat, but I’m not sure she ever did, since we couldn’t clip the ones in her mouth. 

She took the pain as a send-off, and went howling into the piney woods behind the ball diamond. We didn’t see her again for two weeks. She came back barely able to walk, mangy hair falling out, with her jaw rotted off to the bone on one side. A few quills were still hanging on. She refused food, and only drank a little water. 

That’s when my emotional thinking set in, prompting me to act out of ignorance. This dog would not survive, so I thought. We had no choice but to end her suffering. The next morning we enacted our plan. She seemed weaker, and was willing to let one of the boys lead her to a pit we dug. I hid the shotgun behind my back, knowing she would be ultra alert to any muzzle pointing at her. We knew from previous experience pointing the empty gun at her with the hammer cocked and pulling the trigger, eliciting a yelp and quick jump away from the muzzle. So I knew we had a challenge. 

Robert held the dog over the pit. We didn’t think to blindfold her. I cocked the loaded shotgun behind my back so she wouldn’t hear the set of the firing pin. In one smooth sweep I moved the gun muzzle to between her eyes and pulled the trigger. The blast penetrated deep into the ground. In that split second she had already jerked free, and then dragged herself amazingly fast for a deathly sick dog, yelping and crying into the piney woods. I assumed she would die a miserable death.

A month passed. I’ll never forget that morning. There was that mutt on the front doorstep. Some of her fur had grown back, hairless flesh had rebuilt on the side of her jawbone, and she was looking much more alive. I could not believe this was the same dog, but the healing scars on her nose and lower jaw were too obvious. It was also obvious that her jerk away from the muzzle of that gun was timed perfectly.

She stayed with us then, forgiving as dogs do. But from that time on, every time she saw any of us with a gun she took off and hid. She would not hunt. Instead, she became a loving companion to our two-year-old son. For a month I had accused myself of failure. Why didn’t I think to blindfold the dog? I remain amazed with the power of that dog to heal itself. 

In America today, the power to destroy has far more investment in money and brains than the power to facilitate healing. People are not trusted to care for themselves and their destiny. Nations not trusted to root out the festering wounds that easily metastasize into the cancer of terrorism are subjected to military occupation, so we have more soldiers deployed abroad than other nations of the world have deployed altogether. We have sponsored and proliferated drones, the ultimate expensive technology to assassinate possible terrorists around the world with lethal decisiveness and no due process. We have the world’s highest per capita peacetime incarceration rate, at great cost to taxpayers, because we quickly distrust human relations and trust instead our criminal justice system, coercive police action and imprisonment. We have families in crisis beyond their capacity to care for themselves because of our shotgun mentality to blow up health care and other government services. We don’t work to save our national economy through rational restructuring of the worldwide debt problem and stopping bailouts for the big billionaire businesses. So we join with the powerful, playing God with our technology of destruction.

Yet we have, in our constitution and in our religious writings, the clear admonition to let God be God, and direct our care to the lives of the “least of these.”

--
David Graber
graberdb@gmail.com

Monday, March 10, 2014

Our strong moral foundation

We’re good people here in Big Horn County.  We have lots of compassion and common sense wisdom.  We like to think for ourselves.  We don’t want the government or our neighbors to make decisions for us. We realize that our lives are connected with others and that helping our less fortunate neighbors is the right thing to do.   This capacity to connect with people in need outside our immediate family is at the heart of our moral foundation here.  We can do amazing things when given the chance.

 

Look at how we rallied to help our neighbors across the state line.  At the beginning of this long winter, ranchers in South Dakota faced catastrophic losses. Some herds were almost totally wiped out by over two feet of snow that came on high winds, before animals were acclimatized to winter weather. With an instinctive common sense of what’s right and wrong, a large group of Montana ranchers knew exactly what to do.  Money, resources and cows went to aid the less fortunate.  No one held back with a perception that those South Dakota ranchers just made the wrong choices, or were lazy. We didn’t hear much about moral dilemmas in this case.

 

Now we’re dealing with a situation in our own back yard that is a little more complicated. Our declining housing resources and burgeoning demand in Big Horn County have faced off good people here into a difficult disagreement. It has to do with the rental property ordinance proposed in the recent Hardin city council meeting.  There are moral issues on both sides.  We know that it is dangerous and unhealthy for children to grow up in substandard housing. Children who are exposed to rodents and mold have astronomical rates of asthma.  Exposed wires, holes, and lead paint are just accidents waiting to happen.  We wouldn’t give kids kitchen knives and chainsaws to play with, and then blame them for getting hurt. 

 

On the other hand, local rental property owners aren’t a bunch of slum lords. They’re not trying to exploit children and families. They are regular, decent people who are trying to balance their budgets. Sometimes renovating existing rentals isn’t economically feasible for them. If renters are concerned about safety issues, maybe they are the ones to look somewhere else for housing.  

 

Both sides of this issue speak logically and support commonly held values. 

Take, for example, a common scenario in Big Horn County. A tenant with young children demands corrections to living conditions and refuses to make rent payments. Yet that tenant has a history of delinquent payments and family members’ abuse of the living quarters. The land owner initiates legal process to evict the tenant. The tenant countersues to force the landlord to make the needed repairs. The court is stuck between two alternatives. But there is a third alternative in our moral foundation.

 

Recent appeals to legal action and objections to governmental oversight both darken the clouds obscuring that foundation. Sometimes law, with its threat-based system, undermines the basic human foundation of society: that of civility, trust, and commitment to the common good. If we use the power of law to uphold the common welfare of all, it works. But, too often, the popular use of law is to compensate for our inability to trust those we assume are enemies. It assumes life is about winners and losers, and ends up blinding us to the possibility of a good outcome for all.

 

We are obviously at loggerheads. Rather than focusing on reaching a solution that protects all, each side is consumed with digging out legal briefs to bolster their case. Instead of paying attention to real need and common possibilities for resolution we have become focused on winning the argument. Maybe it’s time to look into our moral foundation alternative, easily hidden in the fog of conflict. 

 

We could start by sorting out the exact conflict. Is it really the concept of safe housing on which we disagree? Or is it over the path for ensuring safety? If finding a reasonable process toward safe housing is the problem, let’s find out how other communities do this. Perhaps there are alternate funding options available or strategies for increasing our overall supply of new/safe housing.  Maybe there are legal options that would be less onerous for owners and still protect renters.  Let’s explore all our options for resolution before we assume that our neighbors are out to get us.  This will keep our houses and our community built on our moral foundation, as enshrined in both our Bible and our American Constitution.

 

There are many Bible stories depicting common sense compassionate trust. There are also scholarly resources addressing this in current poverty law nation wide. For Bible references, read all four gospels.  Nearly everyone Jesus encounters is identified with either the elite powerful or the powerless poor. See how the rulers and the poor encounter Jesus differently, and what he expects of them for salvation.

 

Here are websites with information on the topic.

 

http://blog.tifwe.org/myths-of-poverty-wealth-free-enterprise/?gclid=CLjo5MnQib0CFbFFMgod5xoAmQ

 

https://www.law.georgetown.edu/academics/law-journals/poverty/index.cfm

 

http://www.spotlightonpoverty.org/map-detail.aspx?state=Montana

 

http://www.cfra.org/newsletter/2012/06/hometown-housing-burnet-texas-model

 

http://www.cfra.org/news/130305/rural-montana-hurt-tax-holiday

 

http://www.cfra.org/ruralmonitor/2011/11/17/native-business-owners-testify-congress-reservation-populations-growing-acce

 

http://www.iwpr.org/publications/pubs/status-of-women-in-montana