Thursday, September 27, 2012

The World’s Most Effective Educators

 

—have been sabotaged, sidelined and demeaned.

 

Education is the most effective remedy for poverty. Research increasingly proves this, highlighting that early success in learning most correlates with later success in society.

 

Lesser known is the power of parent as teacher. The key to rebuilding education in America is restoring the priority of parent and child as a learning pair, especially with very young children. The erosion of this vital relationship over the decades goes a long way in explaining our dysfunctional society with our rampant incarceration rates, poverty, greed, loss of the American dream, and life stress. 

 

That learning relationship was stronger in the 1940's when my siblings and I were young. My parents and grandparents had been raised under their parents' and grandparents' tutelage. In this way, they learned who they were. The songs, games, stories and religious values of our heritage were internalized, not as head knowledge, but as heart knowledge. They were safe, and they belonged —two things so rare for young children today. When my parents imparted that knowledge to me, I was learning trust and courage through family bonding.

 

Learning was not yet separated out from real human bonding and placed behind a video screen.  No one could have imagined back then how pervasive screen media would be in the life of today's children. 

 

I remember as a boy, when my siblings and I first heard the new word "television." One of our friends told us about this magical invention that his family had obtained.  That night, without parent permission, we sneaked over the crest of the hill after dark toward a flickering blue light coming from their window. We crept up to the window. We could barely make out the neighbor family with their backs to the window, gazing intently at a small flickering screen. On the screen were obvious faces moving and talking. We couldn't understand what they were saying, but the shock was etched in my memory. It was clear that somehow people had been transformed and stuck in a box. How could any child resist this powerful form of hypnotism! We shivered in the cool night and ran home to tell our parents we wanted one of those boxes. 

 

It didn't happen. My father called it a work saver. My grandfather called it the devil's playground. Our church met and decided this worldly device could not be in any church members' homes. If allowed in, it would corrupt our lives and destroy our Salvation. I didn't understand then the importance of human feedback response to learn trust, respect of self and others, and the bond of family. I didn't know then the importance of learning to live with others for life success, and how that that learning starts at a very young age and its importance peaks at around 2 years old when a child is most easily attracted to the artificial pseudo-human feedback the screen media gives.

 

Since then, TV and other screen media have damaged the learning pair relationship of parent and child. It didn't happen because of poor programming. The very best Sesame Street can't stop the damage. It happened because the attraction of moving faces and bodies, gesturing for attention of toddlers, displaces the most crucial learning unit of education in America and around the world: parent with child—especially before age 3.

 

Enter into the Harlem Children's Zone. The New York City hotbed of crime and poverty in the 70's is now a national success story of poverty transformation. Crime is down. Streets are now dramatically safer for children. Alcohol and drug abuse are reduced. Children do not grow up to be incarcerated as before. It happened in Harlem because of an amazing story of parents and their young children pairing for learning for life. Parents were entrusted with their young children, not simply criticized for failing to parent and losing their child to the courts. Parent classes were not penalties for failure to parent properly.  TV is set aside in favor of "Baby College," where children before age 3 learn to function in real human feedback paired with a parent.

 

Across the nation we need to turn back to the naturally occurring parent-child learning pair lost in the last century with the rise of industrialization, the screen media, and an economy that, for survival, daily separates parents from their young. More funding for social services, head start and home visiting educators cannot in itself be compensation for the loss of the world's most effective educators at each child's most powerful learning age. The most effective programs pay a parent to come to a specially designed weekly class paired with their pre-3 child. It's probably the most cost effective wages paid to teachers anywhere.

 

Education administrators and government officials in Big Horn County know the real tax dollar savings potentially available if parents could do better as their children's first teachers. Here we need one of those proven program that focuses on restoring the natural learning connections between our youngest children and their home caregivers, usually Mom.  It's only through acknowledging and restoring parents as a child's first teacher that we can re-establish those early learning experiences vital for educational success in our world today. It's by far the biggest gap in our education system in Big Horn County, and goes a long way toward explaining our schooling difficulties. And we can do something about it.

 

Since the time of my first encounter with TV, this and other screen media have damaged the learning pair relationship of parent and child. It didn't happen because of poor programming. The very best Sesame Street can't stop the damage. It happened because the attraction of moving faces and bodies, gesturing for attention of toddlers, displaces the most crucial learning unit of education in America and around the world: parent with child—especially before age 3.

 

Enter into the Harlem Children's Zone. The New York City hotbed of crime and poverty in the 70's is now a national success story of poverty transformation. Crime is down. Streets are now dramatically safer for children. Alcohol and drug abuse are reduced. Children do not grow up to be incarcerated as before. It happened in Harlem because of an amazing story of parents and their young children pairing for learning for life. Parents were entrusted with their young children, not simply criticized for failing to parent and losing their child to the courts. Parent classes were not penalties for failure to parent properly.  TV is set aside in favor of "Baby College," where children learn to function in real human feedback paired with a parent.

 

Other such programs with this priority have begun across the nation.  A Waldorf School has begun just this year in Lakota country in South Dakota. Missouri in 1970 started a "Parents as Teachers" program that has spread westward, with some content in Montana. Oregon has a growing and well run poverty-alleviation program focusing on the learning pair of parent and young child. Even here in Big Horn County we have the "Family Support Network" pioneering parent involvement with children in school activities. Education administrators and city and county government officials have discovered real tax dollar savings by investing in paying parents to bring children to weekly classes facilitated by professionals in early child education and family dynamics, experienced in proven models expecting commitment to specific curricular content and family change.  

 

There's room for much more here in Big Horn County. We need to examine successful programs such as in Oregon, New York, and South Dakota. We need to hire more professionals experienced in facilitating the learning pair of parent and young child.  And we need learning materials to match the content pre-3's need.

 

Across the nation we need to turn back to the naturally occurring parent-child learning pair lost in the last century with the rise of industrialization, the screen media, and an economy that, for survival, daily separates parents from their young. More funding for social services, head start and home visiting educators cannot in itself be compensation for the loss of the world's most effective educators at each child's most powerful learning age. The most effective programs pay a parent to come to a specially designed weekly class paired with their pre-3 child. It's probably the most cost effective wages paid to teachers anywhere.

 

http://seattletimes.com/html/jerrylarge/2019178227_jdl17.htmlA healthy life may require a good start

Early-life stress and trauma can harm American lives. Columnist Jerry Large says a new book convinced him that the country has to do more to help people when they are young, because stresses and traumas manifest in mental and physical ways later on.

 

Compassionate and based on the latest research, Scared Sick Childhood Trauma unveils a major public health crisis. Highlighting case studies and cutting-edge scientific findings, Karr- Morse shows how our innate fight-or-flight system can injure us if overworked in the early stages of life. Persistent stress can trigger diabetes, heart disease, obesity, depression, and addiction later on.

 

http://www.amazon.com/Scared-Sick-Childhood-Trauma-Disease/

It's written by Robin Karr-Morse and Meredith Wiley. In our youngest children, society sows the seeds of problems that it spends much time and money dealing with as people age. We know that now, and we can do something about it

 

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/16/opinion/sunday/can-great-teaching-overcome-the-effects-of-poverty.html?_r=2

"Are We Asking Too Much From Our Teachers?"  By ALEX KOTLOWITZ     Published: September 14, 2012

"It's been too easy to see this dispute (The Chicago teachers' strike) as one between two hotheaded personalities — Mr. Emanuel and Ms. Lewis, or as a play for respect. Rather, as I spoke with teachers on the picket lines last week, it became clear that it was about something much more fundamental, and something worth our attention: top-notch teaching can't by itself become our nation's answer to a poverty rate that, as we learned the other day, remains stubbornly high: one of every five children in America live below the poverty level."

 

Paul Tough, How Children Succeed  (Houghton Mifflin, Sept. 2012)

Why do some children succeed while others fail?

The following is adapted from Amazon's description:


The story we usually tell about childhood and success is the one about intelligence: success comes to those who score highest on tests, from preschool admissions to SATs.

But in How Children Succeed, Paul Tough argues that the qualities that matter most have more to do with character: skills like perseverance, curiosity, conscientiousness, optimism, and self-control.

How Children Succeed introduces us to a new generation of researchers and educators who, for the first time, are using the tools of science to peel back the mysteries of character. Through their stories—and the stories of the children they are trying to help—Tough traces the links between childhood stress and life success. He uncovers the surprising ways in which parents do—and do not—prepare their children for adulthood. And he provides us with new insights into how to help children growing up in poverty. The role of economics necessitating both parents finding work away from their children is not explored in this book. How would children benefit from the simple economic reform of a living wage law? This book implicitly points in this direction. Too bad it does not 

 

The Death and Life of the Great American School System, by Diane Ravitch (Perseus Books, 2010)

Loads of information with documented official proceedings surrounding changes in education policy.  Actual events with details in sequence paint a reliable picture that damns and exonerates both sides in the public school controversy continuing to rage the nation. As such, this is a valuable contribution to anyone who would deal with issues such as school choice, testing, merit pay, class size, segregation, the role of the arts, student health, violence and bullying, nutrition, curriculum, teacher education and internships, religious concerns, and probably all the major facets of education controversy that continue to this day. I recommend this as a realistic, honest analysis, relayed without political bias. This book can be borrowed at Greenwood Farm.

 

A list of web sites and other sources focusing on parents and their children learning together:

 

http://hcz.org/images/stories/pdfs/ali_summerfall2002.pdf

 

http://mnwaldorf.org/parent-tot-classes/

 

http://www.childrensfarm.org/parent_child.html

 

http://www.quickenloans.com/blog/parentchild-classes-rock

 

http://ici.umn.edu/products/impact/152/prof4.html

 

http://www.cde.state.co.us/cdeadult/download/pdf/FamLitProgModelAdapted.pdf

 

http://www.linnbenton.edu/index.cfm?objectId=64979B60-ED41-11E1-A279001B21BA1DA1

 

http://www.thelittlegym.com/Pages/parent-child.aspx

 

http://www.pacthawaii.org/early_head_start-oahu.html

 

http://www.columbusschoolforgirls.org/program-for-young-children/parents-and-children-together-pact/index.aspx

 

http://www.nova.edu/humandevelopment/earlylearning/pplace/parentchild.html

 

http://www.musictogether.com/MTPCWorld

 

http://www.edinburgh.gov.uk/downloads/file/6249/pre-birth_to_three_parents_leaflet

 

http://www.fcnetwork.org/programs/pact.html

 

http://www.wccf.org/pdf/parentsaspartners_ece-series.pdf

 

http://www.kidsource.com/parenting/parents.part.html

 

http://www.ldaminnesota.org/programs-and-services/community-programs/parents-as-partners

 

http://hcz.org/programs/early-childhood

 

http://www.parentsasteachers.org/

 

www.avance.org

 

www.naeyc.org/files/naeyc/file/.../EDF_Literature%20Review.pdf

 

http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Resource/Doc/147410/0038822.pdf

 

http://www.amazon.com/From-Parents-Partners-Family-Centered-Childhood/dp/1929610882

 

 


--
David Graber

Hardin, MT  59034

www.greenwoodfarmmt.org

graberdb@gmail.com


 

Wednesday, September 12, 2012

The Bible’s Bias and Billionaires


I grew up as an Iowa farm boy in the late 40's and 50's.  I was raised in what we considered to be a very conservative family.  Things were different back then.  Conservative meant responsibility for family, community and nation, and for following the Bible.  Good Christians were those who worked hard and shared their often meager resources with neighbors and also strangers in need.   "Gay" meant happy and none of us kids knew what an "abortion" was.   People seemed much less interested in the sex lives of others.  Maybe we were all so busy on the farm that there wasn't much time for speculation.  It could also be that we had a different standard about what was just none of our business. 

It seems like more recent conservative preoccupation with these personal issues has led us off track.  When you read the New Testament it's easy to see that a bulk of admonitions and guidance are related to social justice and care for vulnerable families, not reproductive issues.  It concerns me that we allow the modern conservative movement to claim that the biblical prohibitions against homosexuality and abortion are to be government enforced by public law when they comprise so few verses.  Then the same groups claim that the extensive Biblical exhortations for a fair economy, to treat the poor with compassion and justice, are none of the government's business but to be performed by private charities. 

 

The American Bible Society has recently published "The Poverty and Justice Bible" as a companion to its new translation, "Contemporary English Version." A total of more than 2000 verses are highlighted, condemning cheating the poor, unjust wages, and greedily depriving the earth, animals and workers of their God-given right to Sabbath rest. These highlighted scriptures promote God's way of doing economics and government, calling humankind to repent and work out God's salvation. The Bible's agenda of poverty and injustice thus competes with the modern Christian agenda based on microscopically fewer words. Human survival, as well as that of our families and nation, depends more on obeying God's dominant moral teachings, as written. That's been my opinion for decades. I know this opinion runs against that of most conservatives today, many I consider good friends. So I was astounded to read a NewsMax article last week shaking my perception that modern conservatives have abandoned the Bible's dominant agenda.  

 

Conservative media sources, led by "NewsMax," have discovered that Wall Street has conned both political parties into legislating a deregulation regime, creating an unprecedented wealth gap in our economy, and bringing our nation to the brink of economic disaster.  Check out this enlightening article: "Nobel Economist Steiglitz: Wealth Gap Causes All of America's Woes. " I was surprised at the apparent abandonment of their pet trickle-down economics.  It seems that modern conservatives are starting to accept that accumulation of wealth among a few is not what creates a common good strong enough to meet needs of our poorest citizens. 

 

Steiglitz makes a powerful point that inequality has always been justified based on the concept that people with the most money actually create wealth for others.  The recent financial crisis has clearly illustrated this to be a myth.  Those who brought the economy to ruin are the same people who have walked away with billions of dollars. Welfare corruption at the bottom end of the national wealth spectrum doesn't hold a candle to the taxpayer paid excess going to the top end. Here in Big Horn County, we'll be paying the bill to recover from their greed for generations.  I doubt those with the money will be doing anything to stimulate our economy.   Is there hope for change this election year? My guess is our burden will continue of working hard to pay both our own living expenses and simultaneously that of America's richest corporate class's excesses. Maybe it will be eased slightly if the Democrats win this November.  I only wish the Republicans would seize the moment and make this a big difference with the Democrats. It's a simple matter of siding with the 99% of us, which would scare the Democrats spitless. It would be an impossibly huge policy change, wouldn't it?

 

Let's hope realists in the conservative camp, like those exploring these issues cited in the Steiglitz column, don't get debunked, branded liberal class warfare extremists, and silenced by the big money media censor mill. From my own conservative roots, I claim their findings as squarely in the center of the conservative philosophy into which I was born in a farmhouse in Iowa in 1942.

 Here's Steiglitz, featured in NewsMax, from his new book, "The Price of Inequality," referring to the major 2008 meltdown, and inadvertently reflecting the Bible's prominent agenda in America today: 
"It may have been a prosperous two decades. But it wasn't like we all shared in this prosperity.
"The financial crisis really made this easy to understand. Inequality has always been justified on the grounds that those at the top contributed more to the economy — 'the job creators.'
"Then came 2008 and 2009, and you saw these guys who brought the economy to the brink of ruin walking off with hundreds of millions of dollars. And you couldn't justify that in terms of contribution to society.
"The myth had been sold to people, and all of a sudden it was apparent to everybody that it was a lie.
"Mitt Romney has called concerns about inequality the 'politics of envy.' Well, that's wrong. Envy would be saying, 'He's doing so much better than me. I'm jealous.' This is: 'Why is he getting so much money, and he brought us to the brink of ruin?' And those who worked hard are the ones ruined. It's a question of fairness."
These new (to conservatives) ideas are the focus of a video by Newt Gingrich, Lou Dobbs and others marketing a new investment strategy to maintain personal wealth in this ruinous economic environment. So one can watch the video with either the goal of protecting ones' six figure investments, or with the goal of understanding and remedying the growing citizen suffering for these errors (sins?) in our national governance, both by the elected government and the governing business sectors.

The video presenters have chosen the first goal. But Steiglitz and these conservative leaders are now at least acknowledging the foolish and immoral errors causing our American problem of poverty and injustice. That's the focus of the Bible too, but with healing and hope instead of protection of personal wealth. Read the Bible for the one side, and watch the video for the other.  Either way, it's time the truth gets out on what's wrong with our economy today.  http://www.alternet.org/hot-news-views/dr-krugman-schools-flabbergasted-rand-paul-govt-employment-going-down-under-obama?akid=9369.144927.vOoj86&rd=1&src=newsletter707734&t=3

On the same lines, here is Jeremiah Goulka. He writes about American politics and culture.  His most recent work has been published in the American Prospect and Salon.  He was formerly an analyst at the RAND Corporation, a recovery worker in New Orleans following Hurricane Katrina, and an attorney at the U.S. Department of Justice. He has recently switched from committed centrist Republican to the Democratic party. Read this link and wonder: Could the above information bring him back to the Republican Party fold?  http://www.alternet.org/news-amp-politics/political-awakening-republican-i-had-viewed-whole-swaths-country-and-world-second?paging=off

David Graber
Hardin, MT  59034

graberdb@gmail.com