Thursday, June 7, 2012

Jubilee or judgement day


In the fall of 1974, a fellow teacher in Busby and son of famed wildlife biologist John Craighead, professor of biology at the University of Montana, opened my eyes to a crisis plaguing the grizzly bear population of Yellowstone Park—a crisis that parallels the economic situation of our larger American society today.  We Montanans have made a radical shift in our thinking about grizzly bear survival in Yellowstone Park.  We desperately need a similar radical shift in thinking for the survival of our American families, if not our nation itself.

Early tourists to Yellowstone were enthralled with wildlife, and grizzly bears quickly learned that people--and their garbage cans--meant food.   Rather than learning to dig grubs and catch fish, grizzly cubs followed their mothers to the dumpsters.   Park visitors paid to watch ferocious grizzlies fight over garbage from the safety of a caged-in concrete stadium.  This was far from what the Creator intended for these creatures.  

It was also deadly business. Bear attacks became serious problems in Yellowstone Park as postwar crowds streamed through that habitat, tempting the bears with cameras and snacks. It also took a terrible toll on the wild grizzly population. As their garbage supply dwindled at the end of tourist season, hungry bears began to raid outlying communities.  Cubs starved. Many renegade bears were shot. (The Grizzly Bears of Yellowstone: Their Ecology In The Yellowstone Ecosystem, by John Craighead and Jay Sumner)

Our naturally self-sufficient American society also needs to develop a new understanding of changes that have happened around us.  Our misguided economy is now destroying families, rather than encouraging appropriate growth and development. It's time to look at reality today, just like we came to realistically appraise Yellowstone bear life in the 70's.  Jubilee could be the answer to setting the bears and us free. 

What is Jubilee?  In short, it's radical redistribution, not so much of wealth, but of the means to make a livelihood. In the Bible, Leviticus 24, it was primarily the restoration of productive land, the primary means of survival then, to children of the owners from fifty years previous. Significantly, it also meant freedom for slaves, release of prisoners, and cancelling of debts. It DID happen in Bible times, contrary to many Bible teachers, but the frequent failure of ancient Israel to practice jubilee is the origin of much of the Bible's prophecy of judgment. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jubilee_%28biblical%29

It's ironic to read the new Jubilee writing from secular-minded economists, such as the famous Boston Group.

Some of the best economists and historians are warning us all that unless we restructure our private mortgage debts and increase citizen access to our economy as a means of livelihood, we will all suffer as our nation teeters on financial disaster. We could even descend into going at each other over dwindling morsels of garbage like the Yellowstone bears.  Maybe in the case of humans those would be junkbonds.

Many of us continue to focus on the poorest families in our country as the scapegoat for our economic problems.  Yet evidence suggests that a great deal of government support is actually going to the richest Americans.  This reminds me of what happened to the Soviet Union during Yeltsin's "glasnost," when partial reform of the failed communist economy toward capitalism led to tragic population loss.   Our national media, anxious to similarly shift accountability because it's again owned by the elite, teaches us to blame only one kind of free-loading welfare-recipient: those at the bottom of our economy.

The Republican majority in the House recently voted to continue the free-loading taxpayer-funded subsidy of oil companies that Obama was trying to curb. This is just one example of how government money is being used to support capitalistic enterprises that should sink or swim on their own.  Remember the bailouts? There are all sorts of justification for this trend, but ultimately it comes down to lopsided welfare for the rich.  As in Russia, and like the garbage-eating bears of Yellowstone, we have found ways to allow free-loading off the lowest classes en masse. We don't see these free-loaders hanging around the streets of Big Horn County. We have to go to Wall Street to find them.

Democrats and Republicans have notoriously left unchallenged welfare for the rich while continuing to cut welfare for the poor. Both parties attempt to keep us distracted with diversionary pelvic issues (abortion and gay rights), while maintaining this system of unjust subsidies. 

Let's remember the Bible's message of Jubilee and stay focused on fair distribution of the means of wealth, rather than wealth itself.  Let's take care of the earth, so that all families can forage successfully to live well. 

The Big Horn County News  column ends here. Further information and additional citing follows.

Our founders felt the principles contained in the Jubilee were so important that they had the Liberty Bell inscribed with words taken straight from Leviticus: "...Proclaim Liberty throughout all the land unto all its inhabitants thereof" (Lev.25: 10). Obviously the concepts underlying the Jubilee have something crucial to say with who we are not only as people of faith, but as Americans. Liberty: It's what the United States is all about. But Americans have an even stronger bond to the Jubilee. We like the Isrealites of old whom God is prescribing the Jubilee to are a land of exiles. "I am the lord your God, who brought you out of Egpyt to give you the land of Canaan and to be your God." (leviticus 25:38) Most of us are of immigrant stock, some of us came here unvolunteerily.
But does the Jubilee speak to a time long gone? If we focus on the literal and look at the specific remedies God prescribed to Moses with the Jubilee celebration: cancellation of debts (Dt. 15:1, 15:9, 31:10, Neh. 10:31; Jer 34:14), the freeing of slaves (Lev 25:39, Ex 21:2), returning land purchased to its original owner (Lev 25:23-24) , letting land lie fallow (Lev 25: 4,11) it certainly appears dated. Slavery has been almost totally eradicated and the importance of land has diminished as we are no longer an agrarian society. But what was God after in the jubilee, the spirit behind it? and what have we learned in the last 3500 years?

According to Leviticus 25, every fiftieth year was to be a jubilee where property would be returned to its ancestral owners, and everyone who had sold themselves as an indentured servant to a fellow Israelite or as a slave to a resident alien would be released:
You shall count off seven weeks of years, seven times seven years, so that the period of seven weeks of years gives forty-nine years. Then you shall have the trumpet sounded loud; on the tenth day of the seventh month -- on the day of atonement -- you shall have the trumpet sounded throughout all your land. And you shall hallow the fiftieth year and you shall proclaim liberty (Hebrew: דרור; LXX: ἄφεσις) throughout the land to all its inhabitants. It shall be a jubilee for you: you shall return, every one of you, to your property and every one of you to your family. (Lev 25:8-10 NRSV)

Usury, fascism and the process of depopulation are three phases of the same process. The murderous debt-collection policies that dominated Imperial Rome destroyed the economy of the entire Mediterranean region, and led to a collapse of the population by 40 percent. The attempt to collect the debt imposed on Europe by the Bardi and Peruzzi banks in the fourteenth century led to the impoverishment of the population, the lowering of its standard of living and immunological resistance, and the devastation of the Black Death, which reduced the continent's population by one-third between 1348 and 1373.
In America, this triple process is far advanced. The Bush and Obama administrations lied that poverty is declining in America. The facts show otherwise, yet today. The minimal number of US poor is 45 million; but another 60 million are barely surviving with household incomes for a family of four within $6,000 of the poverty line. Two out of every five Americans barely subsist during what is supposedly the greatest recovery in American history in this century

Moral hazard is a concept that is arguably misunderstood, since those responsible for the damage have neglected to acknowledge its terms. Moral hazard is perceived by Allan Loeb in Wall Street: Money Never Sleeps as ''being able to steal your money without responsibility''. This very crude description of moral hazard, however, turns out to be fairly exact. In the financial system, moral hazard occurs when the person investing money is not held responsible for the outcome of their investment strategy. – 2atardif.com


Frank Craighead's  nephew was my teaching colleague at Busy in 1974-5. My family and I heard first hand of encounters with grizzlies, and saw many film clips taken in dangerous circumstances. We saw awesome violent footage, and also got a deep impression of the Craigheads' efforts to bring "jubilee" freedom to the bears of Yellowstone.  Ultimately, they were granted freedom from their addiction to garbage, and the survivors relearned the forage structure that was compatible with the ecosystem in place in Yellowstone Park.

The brothers worked hard to stop a "cold turkey" decision that came down from the USDA to utterly end bear access to garbage in a very short time in the late 70's.  The Craigheads promoted a program that would give bears time to relearn their nich in the Yellowstone ecosystem over time, so more would survive. In fact, survival of the Yellowstone grizzly was threatened by this program. Grizzlies were imported from Glacier Park to supplement the Yellowstone population. Now their survival is much better established.  Control of these dangerous animals is still a controversy.

Many modern opponents of evolution reject Darwin's theory of evolution but accept, even practice, evolutionary survival-of-the-fittest in the market place. It's really the worst kind of evolution it threatens families the way bears' existence was threatened in Yellowstone by well-meaning profit-motivated ignorance. But a few bears survived their own judgment day, and now are doing better.

Some Biblical scholars argue that the Jubilee Year was never carried out in practice, suggesting that God has ceased to care about economic justice, that mounting inequalities do not lead to violence, and that we are off the hook. The Old Testament prophets repeatedly denounced those who devoured widows and orphans, taking over lands and houses until there were no (free) people left in the land. When the Children of Israel lost their land and were living in Babylonian exile they pondered their calamity and, with the help of prophets like Jeremiah and Isaiah, they came to understand that idolatry and the injustice it caused, since idolatry is basically greed, were the cause of their disaster.

There is a question here for all societies to ponder. Can growing inequalities
only be resolved by violence? Can any human society can last without mechanisms of redistribution? Free public education, progressive income and inheritance taxes, and universal health insurance are examples of what is needed to prevent social collapse from too much tolerance of the idolatry of greed.

Will the powerful tend toward social justice only if and when violent breakdown of society threatens? Or will they allow jubilee because it's a deeper principle of God's word and human solidarity?  Self interest even of the wealthy requires awareness of human suffering when excessive wealth deprives too many of basic human rights of survival and safety. Jesus focused on this.

For him, perpetual Jubilee was at the heart of the prophets' ministry, and even  more so of his: At the beginning of his ministry, in the Synagogue of Nazareth, Jesus published his "movement manifesto" by reading from the scroll of the
prophet Isaiah: The Spirit of the Lord is upon me for he has anointed me to bring good news to the poor,
to proclaim liberty to the captives,
recovery of sight to the blind,
to let the oppressed go free,
to proclaim the year of the Lord's Favor.
". . . Then he began to speak to them, 'This text is being fulfilled today even as you listen.'" (Luke 4:18-19).

In his book,  The Politics of Jesus, John Howard Yoder quotes a word study by Andre Trocme that identified Jesus' announced "Year of the Lord's Favor" with the Jubilee Year. This has become the consensus of an increasing number of New Testament scholars. In fact, once this connection is made, it is hard to find anything in the Gospels that does not illustrate an ongoing enactment of the Biblical Jubilee.

In Jesus' coming, Jubilee was no longer a periodic and oft' neglected part of Israel's history, but the Messiah and his traveling community practiced an ongoing Jubilee celebration. Jesus went about forgiving sins, bypassing the temple sacrifice system. He taught his disciples to pray, "Forgive us our debts as we have forgiven those who are indebted to us," a moral and economic initiative of grace. Every healing was at the same time a restoration to full participation in the community of Israel. The feeding of the 5,000 and the 4,000 illustrated the plenty that comes from a radical sharing that is blessed by God. The coming of the Holy Spirit at Pentecost triggered a Jubilee avalanche of, sin forgiveness, economic restoration, healing, and baptism into communion of the saints. The periodic practice of Jubilee was turned into a perpetual Jubilee by those who follow Jesus in the way of peace. This is what times of renewal in the Church have always looked like. Jesus came, as he said, not to abolish the law but to fulfill it.

A responsible scholarly theological investigation of this theme is

Although replete with scholarly language, the book is readable. The author attempts to remedy the de-emphasis, a problem of today's theology, of shalom, koinonia and related social transformation at the heart of the Bible's message of salvation. 

Bible is clear. Luke 4:
The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, because he has anointed me to bring good news to the poor. He has sent me to proclaim release (Hebrew: דרור; Greek OT [LXX]: ἄφεσις) to the captives and recovery of sight to the blind, to let the oppressed go free, to proclaim the year of the Lord's favor." (Luke 4:18-19 NRSV; cf. Isaiah 61:1-2; 58:6).


In the 'Book of the Covenant' (Ex. 21-23) there are two regulations concerning the sabbatical year, one about agriculture and one about slavery. First, the regulation concerning agriculture is found in Exodus 23:10-11: For six years you are to sow your fields and harvest the crops, but during the seventh year let the land lie unploughed and unused. Then the poor among your people may get food from it, and the wild animals may eat what they leave. Do the same with your vineyard and your olive grove. (NIV)

In the Jubilee God speaks to us about right living. We are told how we should treat each other and the land--that all shall be set free! The principle(s) is so simple but it is profound and powerful. Yet generation upon generation have refused to follow its tenets, thinking it foolhardy or too dificult to follow. By doing such we have turned this basic truth into a hidden mystery. Liberty is power--the power to free ourselves.
We easily can find the free-loading low-initiative poor. Every community has some, trying to get from government what they cannot get or are too lazy to get for themselves. 

Jubilee in the Bible teaches that it's the responsibility both of government and of individuals to support a major revolutionary redistribution of the means—not the result—of productive work every 50 years. It wasn't wealth simple redistribution, and obsession of political talk today; it was land redistribution. Land, after all, was the foundation of wealth in that economy.  So Jesus' words frequently refer to land and its production, not to his father's work, carpentry.

Some comments on jubilee-related issues from The Economist's View, a clearinghouse of current writings by economists at universities around the world:

Tuesday, March 20, 2012
Simon Johnson says we are "on a bipartisan route to disaster":
A Colossal Mistake of Historic Proportions: The "JOBS" bill, by Simon Johnson: From the 1970s until recently, Congress allowed and encouraged a great deal of financial market deregulation – allowing big banks to become larger, to expand their scope, and to take on more risks. This legislative agenda was largely bipartisan, up to and including the effective repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act at the end of the 1990s. After due legislative consideration, the way was cleared for megabanks to combine commercial and investment banking on a complex global scale. The scene was set for the 2008 financial crisis – and

Wednesday, March 07, 2012
Surprise, surprise, Larry Tabb, the founder and chief executive of Tabb Group, is complaining about regulation of the financial sector. He starts off strong:
Mea Culpa? Yes, the banks did wrong. They became overlevered; hopped-up on greed, they took on more credit than a loan shark would have extended. When the bets turned sour, they went cap in hand to the taxpayer. Once bailed out, the banks threw petrol on the fire by not being contrite, hoovering up cheap cash, paying bonuses as if there were no tomorrow and refusing to develop a set of even the least offensive business restrictions.

But quickly changes course:
So what did legislators and regulators do? They did what they normally do in a crisis: they legislated and regulated. While the new rules may or may not preclude another crisis, they will certainly punish the banks and may inadvertently punish the taxpayer.


Saturday, March 03, 2012
The chairman of the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission, Phil Angelides, wonders if there will ever be a thorough investigation and prosecution of "the financial assault on our country":
Will Wall Street Ever Face Justice?, by Phil Angelides, Commentary, NY Times: Last week, Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. proclaimed in a speech that when it comes to fighting financial fraud, the Obama administration's "record of success has been nothing less than historic." Such self-congratulation is not only premature, but it also reveals a troubling lack of understanding about what is required to win the war against financial wrongdoing.
Four years after the disintegration of the financial system, Americans have, rightfully, a gnawing feeling that justice has not been served

Sunday, February 26, 2012
Daniel Davies on the history and purpose of debt contracts (this is from a series of posts at Crooked Timber discussing David Graeber's new book Debt: The First 5,000 Years):
Too Big To Fail: The First 5000 Years, by Daniel Davies: One of the many fascinating pieces of information that David Graeber tosses off like shrapnel in Debt is that the first recorded appearance of the word "freedom" in a political document is in a Sumerian proclamation of a debt amnesty or jubilee.
What interested me, however, from the point of view of a professional banker, is that the document in question provided only for the discharge of personal debts of the Sumerians; commercial debts of merchants were not discharged. ... The point I am trying to make here is that as well as being the first mention of the word "freedom", this proclamation marks

Ehrenreich: How Corporations and Local Governments Rob the Poor Blind
The trick is to rob them in ways that are systematic, impersonal, and almost impossible to trace to individual perpetrators.

Individually the poor are not too tempting to thieves, for obvious reasons. Mug a banker and you might score a wallet containing a month's rent. Mug a janitor and you will be lucky to get away with bus fare to flee the crime scene. But as Business Week helpfully pointed out in 2007, the poor in aggregate provide a juicy target for anyone depraved enough to make a business of stealing from them.

According to a new study by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, the number of Americans living on less than $2 a day has doubled in the past 15 years. That's right -- nearly 1.5 million Americans are living in the kind of extreme poverty that, until now, has been associated with developing countries.

No political candidate is serious about the debt problem, deficit spending, and the impact of our economic depression on average people. Check this out.

Folks at this organization envisage a political culture where everyone has the skills, the information, the opportunities and the right to contribute to solving society's problems. "We create tools for groups of people to learn about, discuss and decide on complex issues."  This is a core principle of jubilee.


Hammurabi Knew Better
Debt Slavery – Why It Destroyed Rome, Why It Will Destroy Us Unless It's Stopped
by MICHAEL HUDSON
Book V of Aristotle's Politics describes the eternal transition of oligarchies making themselves into hereditary aristocracies – which end up being overthrown by tyrants or develop internal rivalries as some families decide to "take the multitude into their camp" and usher in democracy, within which an oligarchy emerges once again, followed by aristocracy, democracy, and so on throughout history.
Debt has been the main dynamic driving these shifts – always with new twists and turns. It polarizes wealth to create a creditor class, whose oligarchic rule is ended as new leaders ("tyrants" to Aristotle) win popular support by cancelling the debts and redistributing property or taking its usufruct for the state.

Contract Theory, Distributive Justice,
and the Hebrew Sabbatical

No idea for freeing our nation from the threat of judgment day because of our mistreatment of "the least of these" is one soundly based in our Bible. It's the idea of jubilee.

But the Biblical basis for an American jubilee doesn't come into public discussion from religionists. It comes instead from economists—actually, a group of highly respected economists based in Boston.


India's legendary Wootz steel from 300 BC  met.iisc.ernet.in/~rangu/text.pdf

Iron has both creative and destructive associations. If iron has represented the sustenance of life through agricultural implements, its destructive potency has been amply demonstrated by the weapons of war and conquest. In the words of the famous Roman scientist, Pliny the Elder, of 2000 years ago,
'Iron mines bring man a most splendid and most harmful tool. It is by means of this tool that we cut into the ground, plant bushes, cultivate flourishing orchards and make grape vines younger every year by cutting off old vines with grapes. By this same tool we build houses, break stones and use iron for all purposes. But it is also with the help of iron that we fight and battle and rob. And we do it not only at close quarters but giving it wings we hurl it far into the distance now from embrasures now from powerful human hands, now from bows in the form of feathered darts. This, I think, is the most infamous invention of the human brain. For in order to enable death to catch up with man faster, it has given it wings and armed iron with feathers. For that the blame rests with man and not with Nature'.

The average salaried worker makes 10% money less than a decade ago. This is on top of a half-century decline in real income.  What happened to the American dream? The only ones who believe it anymore are those who made it. 


According to the operative theory—developed by the founding fathers of libertarianism/neoliberalism, Friedrich von Hayek, Ludwig von Mises, Milton Friedman and the rest—a privately-owned company will always outperform a state-run company because private ownership and the profit-motive incentivize the owners to make their companies stronger, more efficient, more competitive, and so on. The theory promises that everyone benefits except for the bad old state and the lazy. The story of Russia since the arrival of capitalism with Yeltsin is a case in point.


At the end of the 1990s, after the total collapse of the mass-privatization experiment in Boris Yeltin's Russia, some of the more earnest free-market proselytizers tried making sense of it all. The unprecedented collapse of Russia's economy and its capital markets, the wholesale looting, the quiet extermination of millions of Russians from the shock and destitution (Russian male life expectancy plummeted from 68 years to 56 years)—the terrible consequences of imposing radical libertarian free-market ideas on an alien culture—turned out worse than any worst-case-scenario imagined by the free-market true-believers.

In reality, as everyone was forced to admit by 1999, Russia's privatized companies were stripped and plundered as fast as their new private owners could loot them, leaving millions of workers without salaries, and most of Russia's industry in far worse shape than the Communists left it.


The central message of Paul Krugman's new book, End This Depression Now! is simple: It doesn't have to be like this. No external dynamic is keeping unemployment at more than 8 percent and consigning a generation of young workers to an economy in which risk is plentiful and opportunities scarce. It is only a failure of political will -- and an almost universal embrace of conservative voodoo economics – that is keeping us mired in this dark economic moment.

Following is from an interview conducted with Paul Krugman (PK), based on his new book:

Of the 2009 stimulus, Krugman writes, "Those who had more or less the right ideas about what the economy needed, including President Obama, were timid, never willing either to acknowledge just how much action was required or to admit later on that what they did in the first round was inadequate." Instead of treating the dismal jobs picture as a crisis requiring their full attention, Washington "pivoted" to talking about the deficit – a phantom menace -- at precisely the wrong time. "People with the wrong ideas," Krugman writes, "were vehement and untroubled by self-doubt."

PK: The moral of the book is: this doesn't have to be happening. This is essentially a technical process; it's a small thing. It's like having a dead battery in a car, and while there may be a lot wrong with the car, you can get the car going remarkably easily, if you're willing to accept that's what the problem really is.

 Not enough spending. Cuts in state an local government pay and workforce cutbacks. School teachers especially.
If government spending for public enterprises had expanded in the Obama administration as it did in the Bush administrations, reflecting population changes, we would have 1.3 million more jobs now. From this there would be indirect effects we are now missing in lower family debts, more spending on needs, and our economy would be much better.  That's something like 2 million more jobs. That's something like 2 million jobs right there. "When you put it all together my back of the envelope says "…If we weren't doing this austerity, GDP would be around 3 percentage points higher right now, the unemployment rate would be at least 1.5 points lower, which means we'd be at 6.5 percent."

Democrats say the government has to pull in spending when families do. Isn't that the reverse of the truth? Isn't it the fact that when families are tightening their belts the government needs to loosen its belt to make up for that loss of demand?
PK: That's right. The whole mistake that people make is that we're all like a family. We're not because we're interdependent. Your spending is my income and my spending is your income. If we both tighten our belts at the same time thinking that's going to make us better off, it actually makes us worse off. This is a fundamental fallacy.

This notion that we have to have extreme income inequality in order to have a successful, growing economy requires that you forget history that's live in the minds of everybody over the age of 50. The best generation of economic growth we've ever had in America was the generation right after World War II. That was a society in which the rich were not even remotely as rich as they are now. How come we created all those jobs -- all those good jobs -- at a time when the top tax rate was as high sometimes as 90 percent?

There are many who believe we must not only slash spending and cut social programs, but also for some reason we must slash taxes on rich and the corporations.

JH: We're not the only ones who have been afflicted by this scourge of irrational deficit hysteria -- the idea that we should cut spending when private sector demand is deep in a hole.
The bond markets are willing to lend America -- the US government -- long-term money at about 1.7 percent as of right now. That's ridiculously low. The index bonds that are protected from inflation actually have a negative interest rate. The bond markets are saying they're worried about economic stagnation. They're worried there aren't going to be investment opportunities because the demand is so weak. So they're going to park their money in US government debt, which is considered safe. The last thing you should be worrying about, at least according to the bond market, is those deficits. Those are not the problem right now.

What happens is when the wealthy are very wealthy they can in effect buy political support. The way that's worked in practice in the United States is that the Republican party moves with the interests of the super elite. Not the 1 percent, but the .01 percent. So the extraordinary explosion in incomes of the .01 percent relative to everybody else has pulled the Republican party far to the right to the point where there is no center. The center did not hold, it dissolved and turned into a chasm. That's not because Democrats moved to the left, because they didn't; they moved right. It's because the Republicans moved off into the Gamma quadrant. That is at the root of our political paralysis right now

The wealthy .01% They not only spend money directly on campaigns, but they also fund these networks of what I call alternative information infrastructure. If you look at for example billionaire Pete Peterson he's put $1 billion of his own money into a network of think tanks and media projects to help us understand that the greatest threat that we face are deficits, far-off deficits projected 30 or 40 years out.

--
David Graber

Hardin, MT  59034

graberdb@gmail.com

Wednesday, May 23, 2012

Duck & Dive

Two weeks ago my second grade music class at Crow Agency Public School wanted to sing and dance the "Duck & Dive." A week later someone asked if I had seen the old documentary The Atomic  Café, which contains a film clip from 1950 of students in a New York City school "ducking and diving" under their desks during a nuclear attack drill. What an interesting coincidence!  I remembered seeing that film several years ago, and the clip in question had refreshed my memory of practicing the same nuclear attack drill as a 2nd grader in 1950 at my one-room country elementary school in Iowa. The connection between the two "duck and dive" approaches had never occurred to me before.  There is a similarity. But unlike that nuclear attack drill, the Crow Indian song and dance version is rational.

 

I believe it's important to teach children to deal rationally with dangers. The Crow version of "Duck & Dive" relates to dodging a bullet or an arrow—a rational and useful strategy in warfare. But the 1950's nuclear version presented fear on a much larger scale. Because the teachings in the film were totally irrational—ducking and diving could not possibly protect any students in ground zero—the film was soon pulled from appropriate content for students.

 

You should check out The Atomic Café if you get a chance.  The propagandized statements in the documentary are so dated and off-base that they are hilarious.  It's really fun to watch it from the perspective of 2012.  The irrationality of fears governing hearts and minds of Americans at that time quickly becomes clear. 

 

Tom Englehardt's book, the United States of Fear, makes a related point.  As a nation, we may be succumbing to the same fears and expensive responses in life, blood, human rights abuse and international disrespect that brought down the Soviet Union a few decades ago. Some evidence of this is our two entrenched loyal allies whose brutal dictators were debunked and dethroned (initially against our will) in the Arab Spring: Egypt and Tunisia.  Englehardt uses data to illustrate how and why our huge investment of lives and dollars in world-wide military domination is actually damaging our nation and making us less safe, rather than increasing our national security.

 

We keep seeing more books, articles, and opinion pieces about the decline of America.  Until recently, I thought these were misguided attempts to instill fear and contempt for the United States.  For example, when I was a teacher in China, back in 2001, I enjoyed confronting students with real economic data when asked, "When (not if) do you think China will overtake America as the number one world power?" Since then, my certainty has  vastly diminished. Am I succumbing to my own version of 1950s duck and dive or is the evidence of decline really compelling?  I'm starting to ask myself more questions about our position in the world and what it really takes to defend ourselves, versus feeding an insatiable quest for military domination.

 

Do our fears lead us to imitate the decline and fall of the Soviet Union? Is there more than an ironic coincidence that we are bogged down in a war in the Middle East with the same country that the Soviet Union was fighting just before its demise? Is our heavy toll of human rights abuse, excessive civilian casualties, and casualties of our own troops the real reason for the polls that say a majority of us oppose Obama's war?  Have we become skeptical of the continual stream of positive news from the battlefields via the pentagon? Is America really in decline, ready to fall? 

 

I invite fellow citizens to carefully examine and ponder the evidence they see across sources.  If we find it compelling, we need to challenge our government to make the kinds of changes that will keep us all safe and guarantee the future of the human race.  

 

This last week of school, when my Crow Indian students dance and sing their "Duck & Dive," I'll be reminded of rational ways to handle fears and find real security. Our awesome power to kill is not rationally the foundation of personal, family and national security. Irrationally, we have degraded the God of Scripture into a god blessing chariots, swords and horses. Now, 2000 years after those sacred writings, we regularly invoke God's blessing of our more efficient technology of massive destruction. It's a minority of Christians in America who still trust what Jesus really says about God's power for personal, family and national security in the face of the fears from which we learned to "duck and dive" for safety. If you doubt this, pick one of the four Gospels and read it entirely. Read right on through Jesus' resurrection and ascension, and try to discern the real messages rather than the conventional ones.

 

The following material is only in my blog, not in the Big Horn County News:

 

I had already read much of the content of the book in TomDispatch.com, essays by Tom Englehardt and others.

 

Here's the jist of Englehardt's book: Since our entry into the nuclear age, having dropped two bombs on two major cities obliterating almost their entire population in one blinding flash each, we the American citizenry have been fed a fear obsession that has twisted our culture into a faster and faster suicidal vortex as a nation.

 

Believe this? I doubt many  Americans do. But I admit that information from that film and that book have brought skepticism to bear on my skepticism. 

 

Our American defense spending harms rather than helps American power and prestige because we end up supporting dictators with our lavish gifts of military hardware and support. And this is calculated as foreign aid.  Just on our own defense, we are spending 47 percent of the world's total military spending. The Arab Spring—with the overthrow of US supported dictators in Egypt and Tunisia-demonstrates this erosion of American power.  Without our military support of these dictators they would have been overthrown or outvoted long ago. Our habit of seeking unsavory allies to support with military aid is highlighted currently in the  continued Egyptian turmoil, because the generals have enormous difficulty relinquishing power to civilian control.

 

More recently, the efforts to "revitalize the bugaboo of Chinese military power" is cited as justification for Obama's increase in American military spending to expand our world military occupation into east Asia.

 

Ashes to ashes, dust to dust, if the drones don't get you, the fallout must.

This is a review of Tom Englehardt's latest book, February 27, 2012

By Chris (Washington state, USA)

The United States of Fear (Paperback)

Something very much in evidence in this book is Mr. Englehardt's ability as a writer. The essays in this book are well written.

Some of the topics covered by the author include terrorism vs. food poisoning in terms of the threat presented to Americans; Raymond Davis; and the author's education about the world through viewing foreign films while growing up in Manhattan in the 1950's. A recurrent subject in the book is the misleading or farcical nature of the "deadlines" civilian and military officials give for the withdrawal of US troops from Afghanistan. The exorbitant costs of the Iraq and Afghanistan military ventures are another prominent theme. For example, he focuses heavily on the mega-embassies/regional command centers/cities within cities that we have built or are building in Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan. Englehardt quotes a National Priorities Project study which found that the $790 million price tag for the new embassy and consular facilities in Afghanistan could have provided jobs for 22,000 teachers, 15,000 healthcare workers and 13,000 clean energy workers in the US. Other exorbitant costs noted by the author include several tens of billions of dollars in unsuccessful programs to train Afghan military and police and $773,000 to remodel a cinder block building to house a KFC/Taco Bell for our soldiers in Guantanamo Bay. The Gitmo torture camp, of course, is still open though Obama promised to close it.

The American method of fighting the "War on Terror" receives coverage in this book. He discusses examples of civilian casualties from the American war in Afghanistan (along with a few in Iraq). He notes that Wikileaks released a video of a US Apache helicopter attack on a Baghdad street in July 2007 that killed 12 non-combatants, including two Reuters employees and a father of two children who had stopped his vehicle to help the wounded of the attack. The Pentagon covered up this massacre until Wikileaks released the video of it. Englehardt notes that Wikileaks also released Pentagon logs showing that hundreds of civilians had been killed in unreported US military actions in Afghanistan. Englehardt reports an incident in February 2010 in Paktia province in Afghanistan. In that incident US snipers killed a local police intelligence chief, his brother and three women. The snipers dug the bullets out of the dead women, bound and gagged them and claimed that the dead men had killed the women in an "honor killing." The American media, as is their wont, accepted the military's version at face value until the version started to crumble and the military paid the victim's relatives $30,000 and sacrificed a goat. Other atrocities include a US raid that killed a prosperous Afghan businessman with ties to the Afghan government and 76 members of his extended family in August 2008; the killing of 27 civilians in an attack on a minibus in February 2010; the indiscriminate shooting by marine special forces retaliating for a suicide bomb along an Afghan road in April 2007, killing--among others-- a 75 year old man and a 16 year old girl gathering grass for her family's farm; and a March 2011 massacre of 9 Afghan boys collecting wood. David Petraeus and Robert Gates apologized for this last atrocity to President Karzai though in the case of another air attack that killed 65 civilians--including children--Petraeus suggested that it was a fabricated atrocity. According to Englehardt, the US has also massacred at least half a dozen Afghan wedding parties in air attacks since 2001. He quotes Stanley McChrystal as saying that US troops have killed a lot of people who were no threat to them at checkpoints in Afghanistan. He notes that US troops have been in the habit of bulldozing homes and destroying agricultural walls in southern Afghanistan in order to build roads and other conveniences for their war against the Taliban.

Englehardt implies that civilian deaths caused by the US military in Afghanistan are, for the most part, not deliberate. However American pilots are often unable to tell the difference between insurgents and non-combatants. Often, information about suspected terrorists is very unreliable.
Englehardt notes that Mike Mullen and Robert Gates declared that Jullian Assange had a lot of blood on his hands as a result of the Wikileaks file leaks. He notes that it is rather rich that Mullen and Gates make this charge, when it is they who have real blood on their hands.

Englehardt's overall picture is that US foreign policy is dominated by a military industrial complex--most particularly Pentagon officials and arms manufacturers who have a vested interest in continued astronomical military spending. State, local and federal budgets are being slashed for essential services but the military budget is only slowed in its growth. The United States accounts for 47 percent of the world's military spending. In spite of the military-industrial complex, Englehardt writes that American power is declining and it won't be long before the US is not the superpower it once was. He suggests that the Arab Spring--with the overthrow of US supported dictators in Egypt and Tunisia-demonstrates this erosion of American power. He notes recent efforts to revitalize the bugaboo of Chinese military power as one of the justifications for increasing American military spending.

It is certainly depressing that Bradley Manning, Jullian Assange and other whistleblowers are prosecuted by President Obama--who also refuses to prosecute Bush administration torture enablers and war criminals. Of course, Obama himself along with Gates, Mullen, George HW Bush, John Negroponte, Bill Clinton etc. are not prosecuted in spite of being guilty of crimes against humanity.

Englehardt discusses the use of drones in US combat operations but I wish he would have cited the studies about the many hundreds of civilians that Obama's drone attacks have killed in Pakistan.

The author provides no footnotes but explains in a note at the very end of the book that URL sources are available on the pages where these essays were originally published at TomDispatch.com  (end of this book review)

 

I began my awareness of my own culpability to fear while in China. Like most residents of rural America, I have gone to several air shows and watched the exhibit of awesome power. Soon after arriving at XiHua University (Pixian County, Chengdu, Sichuan, China), I was treated to the deafening sound of low altitude fighter jets flying in formation, their delta wings in and out of the clouds.  Seeing that air force power and watching the red flag with the bright yellow hammer and sickle flying over our campus with the air power overhead gave me a queasy feeling in my stomach. Do I trust the Chinese with this kind of military might like I remember trusting American military might? I wasn't sure.

 

The 9-11 event while in China only increased my subliminal anxiety. But as time went on we learned to go about our business and gradually adjusted to being with genuinely caring, compassionate friends.  I got over it. 

 

Soon after returning from China I happened to watch the documentary, "The Atomic Café."  If only we as a nation could reduce our fears to an innocuous fun dance, and stop the flow of our nation's blood and cash.  It would help to learn a thing or two from the Crow "Duck & Dive," from Englehardt's book, and from "The Atomic Café."  I highly recommend immersion in all three.  

--
David Graber

Hardin, MT  59034

www.greenwoodfarmmt.org



Thursday, May 10, 2012

I thought I had to play God

 

Stop. Look. Listen. Remember those old RR track crossing signs, now extinct? http://www.istockphoto.com/stock-photo-1277156-classic-railroad-crossing-stop-look-and-listen-caution-warning-sign.php

 

Misinformation, impatience and the power to act decisively can be lethal.  In the following personal account, I was attuned to the power of the family 20 gauge. An intervention beyond my control saved a life.

 

A mutt adopted us. It was a red spaniel bird dog mix that appeared one evening without a collar near my wife's parents' home just out of Gulfport, Mississippi. We didn't feed her that evening. She was there again the next morning, obviously looking for a family. Our family agreed to be adopted.

 

So we discovered she loved hunting. She was good, pointing and waiting until our signal to flush a quail covey. We didn't wonder; we just accepted the good luck. She helped us hunting nutria, 'possums and armadillos, looking for bull snakes and moccasins in Cyprus swamps, fishing in the Gulf, beach combing, and building and paddling pirogues on the bayou. There was plenty for a red longhair bird dog mutt to do.

 

But then tragedy happened: she attacked the wrong prey. The first clue was when we were walking to get the mail. We noticed her down the road by the swamp loping in circles and howling. I couldn't figure out if she caught someone's stocking cap in her teeth or had an overgrown beard under her chin. That perception changed in a hurry as we approached her. She was sporting a massive cluster of porcupine quills under her chin, in her nose and even her mouth.

 

The boys inquired with a neighbor what to do. Let them fester and come out on their own, said the old man. It's impossible to pull out that many porcupine quills without doing lethal damage.

 

So I helped my wife's younger brothers clip them off, a task that still turns my stomach thinking about it. It was tough holding her to clip them off. We hoped she could eat, but I'm not sure she ever did, since we couldn't clip the ones in her mouth.

 

She took the pain as a send-off, and went howling into the piney woods behind the ball diamond. We didn't see her again for two weeks. She came back barely able to walk, mangy hair falling out, with her jaw rotted off to the bone on one side. A few quills were still hanging on. She refused food, and only drank a little water.

 

That's when my emotional thinking set in, prompting me to act out of ignorance. This dog would not survive, so I thought. We had no choice but to end her suffering. The next morning we enacted our plan. She seemed weaker, and was willing to let one of the boys lead her to a pit we dug. I hid the shotgun behind my back, knowing she would be ultra alert to any muzzle pointing at her. We knew from previous experience pointing the empty gun at her with the hammer cocked and pulling the trigger, eliciting a yelp and quick jump away from the muzzle. So I knew we had a challenge.

 

Robert held the dog over the pit. We didn't think to blindfold her. I cocked the loaded shotgun behind my back so she wouldn't hear the set of the firing pin. In one smooth sweep I moved the gun muzzle to between her eyes and pulled the trigger. The blast penetrated deep into the ground. In that split second she had already jerked free, and then dragged herself amazingly fast for a deathly sick dog, yelping and crying into the piney woods. I assumed she would die a miserable death.

 

A month passed. I'll never forget that morning.  There was that mutt on the front doorstep. Some of her fur had grown back, hairless flesh had rebuilt on the side of her jawbone, and she was looking much more alive. I could not believe this was the same dog, but the healing scars on her nose and lower jaw were too obvious.  It was also obvious that her jerk away from the muzzle of that gun was timed perfectly.

 

She stayed with us then, forgiving as dogs do. But from that time on, every time she saw any of us with a gun she took off and hid.  She would not hunt. Instead, she became a loving companion to our two-year-old son. For a month I had accused myself of failure. Why didn't I think to blindfold the dog? I remain amazed with the power of that dog to heal itself.

 

In America today, the power to destroy has far more investment in money and brains than the power to facilitate healing. People are not trusted to care for themselves and their destiny. Nations not trusted to root out the festering wounds that easily metastasize into the cancer of terrorism are subjected to military occupation, http://groups.yahoo.com/group/justpeaceuk/

 

 so we have more soldiers deployed abroad than other nations of the world have deployed on foreign soil altogether. http://www.vetfriends.com/US-deployments-overseas/  

 

We have sponsored and proliferated drones, the ultimate expensive technology to assassinate possible terrorists around the world with lethal decisiveness and no due process. http://www.codepinkalert.org/section.php?id=29

 

We have the world's highest per capita peacetime incarceration rate, at great cost to taxpayers, because we quickly distrust human relations and trust instead our criminal justice system, coercive police action and imprisonment. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-4Sn6mXiFT4

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JWg-rLYcO7o

 

We have families in crisis beyond their capacity to care for themselves because of our shotgun mentality to blow up health care subsidy and other government services. http://spiritofjubilee.com/



We don't work to save our national economy through rational restructuring of the worldwide debt problem and stopping bailouts for the big billionaire businesses. So we join with the powerful, playing God with our technology of destruction.

 

Yet we have, in our constitution and in our religious writings, the clear admonition to let God be God, and direct our care to the lives of the "least of these." Read the Bible, start with Matthew's Gospel, the New Testament, a sample: http://www.esvbible.org/search/Matthew%2B25/


41 "Then he will say to those on his left, e'Depart from me, you fcursed, into gthe eternal fire prepared for hthe devil and his angels. 42 For iI was hungry and you gave me no food, I was thirsty and you gave me no drink, 43 I was a stranger and you did not welcome me, naked and you did not clothe me, sick and in prison and you did not visit me.' 44 Then they also will answer, saying, 'Lord, when did we see you hungry or thirsty or a stranger or naked or sick or in prison, and did not minister to you?' 45 Then he will answer them, saying, 'Truly, I say to you, as you did not do it to one of the least of these, jyou did not do it to me.' 46 And these will go away kinto eternal punishment, but the righteous kinto leternal life."

 

 

 St. Peter's words, after accusing the crowd gathered at Solomon's portico of the Jerusalem temple AD 33 of killing Jesus, "And now, brothers, I know that you acted in ignorance, as did also your rulers…"   —Acts 3:17

Jesus' words from the cross, "Father forgive them, for they know not what they do." —Luke 23: 34

 

http://consortiumnews.com/2012/04/25/how-obama-recycled-a-lie-about-iran/

 

Obama is now the first United States President in history to request and be granted the legal right to secretly select and carry out extra-judicial killing of an American citizen anywhere in the world, including inside this nation. Such a drastic repudiation of our constitutional rights should guarantee his defeat in re-election this fall, and the repudiation of any competing party or presidential candidate who supports such horrific government trampling on our constitution. 

 

Execute any American citizen of his choice abroad or in this country, anywhere in the world, without access to trial or defense of any kind. The drone campaign is a politically palatable alternative to rendition. Look up CODEPINK and follow links for research into erroneous targeting of innocent civilians for assassination by our government overseas, including American citizens. Also look at how our government made a mess of prosecuting terrorist suspects such as Guantanamo inmates in closed military tribunals, instead of accessing the transparency and decency of our civilian court system.  And discover how and why this fosters the growth of terrorism against United States citizens, especially those who travel abroad.


--
David Graber

Hardin, MT  59034

graberdb@gmail.com

Wednesday, April 25, 2012

And now for the Spring 2012 flood…


 

You might remember this time last spring when Big Horn County was inundated with murky water. Well, it's time to pull on our gum boots and get ready for another deluge.  We should be getting plenty of murky information between now and November.  Unfortunately, this flood will sweep our whole country.

 

It has already started in the media, with plenty of thunderous blame being inflicted on our American government and democratically elected officials. Regular folks are pushed to forget about civility, kindness, and any attempt to understand the views of others by the vitriolic TV and radio talk shows. I stopped the media in my house since it raised the level of irrationality and began seeding clouds of hatred and innuendo. Similar floods in the past have crested in assassinations.  Think about Martin Luther King, Jr, the Kennedys and Gabrielle Giffords .

 

Everyone has the right to free speech, but at what point should we raise incoherent ramblings of hatred (from less than savory sources) to the level of relevant discourse? Recently, Ted Nugent, the flashy entertainer from the 70's, promised that if Obama is elected he will either be dead or in prison by this time next year. Such chilling assassination rhetoric used against Obama publicly sounds an awful lot like the toxic speech I initially heard in the sixty's from the John Birch Society and the Ku Klux Klan against human targets in Southern Mississippi. It was not considered socially acceptable back then for the media to direct-quote such speech. Now media moguls mob Nugent and feast on his and other toxic emissions.  Try a few links:

http://mediamatters.org/search/tag/hate_speech

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/OTUS/ted-nugent-history-amendment/story?id=16173310#.T5gDJY4zLXM

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/04/ted-nugent-rebuffs-democratic-attacks-im-a-black-jew-at-a-nazi-klan-rally/

http://www.chicano.ucla.edu/research/HateSpeech.asp

 

Closer to home, misinformation about the future of farming abounds.  It's easy to be confused when small family farms are lumped into the same category as mega-agribusiness.  Let's face it, how we farm here in Big Horn County is very different from huge industrialized agriculture.  I got wind of a youtube video that purports to reveal how Obama is going to end family farming as we know it.  After a little background searching, I discovered that the DOT regulation under question was not meant to apply to family farms and has been repealed.  The regulation was not, in fact, initiated by Obama.  The reality is that Obama will do nothing other than preserve my freedom to teach my grandson to drive my tractor, with the same freedom for family farms into the next generations. 

 

Clear rational skies reveal the truth that neither Obama nor Romney want to undermine our freedoms now or in the future. But we all, and any president, need rational citizens to speak up, force organizations like ALEC to end their meddling in our legislative processes with taxpayer-supported lobbying, and dry up the noisy storms of ranting and raving luminaries.

.  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UiFnnR_gpvg&feature=share

http://www.nfib.com/issues-elections/issues-elections-item?cmsid=57923

 

 

But there's hope!  A new majority of Americans now believe our recent wet/dry, hot/cold, extreme storm experience indicate the human factor in the global climate change from greenhouse gases. This human factor looms conspicuously in Big Horn County, with the millions of coal tonnage rattling our windows and shaking our boots adding up each time a hundred 20-ton cars roll buy on the Burlington Northern destined for the air above the planet we and all critters and plants breath. This should take our breath away. When, if ever, have humans emitted anywhere near the current megatons of that stuff up into the air? Will God intervene in our foolish disregard for his creation? Well-funded voices say He will, but thankfully, now more are doubting God will pander to this human foolishness.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/18/science/earth/americans-link-global-warming-to-extreme-weather-poll-says.html

 

One more piece of good news.  In January, the Montana Supreme Court upheld our state's right to enforce its own anti-corruption election finance laws, in defiance of the federally mandated ruling permitting unlimited corporate spending in state elections.  There's still a fight ahead, but Montana's willingness to follow common sense in these times of intense political division should be applauded. In March, a petition was filed that asks the U.S. Supreme Court to hear the Montana case on appeal and to summarily reverse Montana's ruling. Legal argument later in April will ask the Court to deny the petition and to refuse to hear the case on constitutional grounds. If that happens it will be a victory for states' rights and the Supreme Court's challenge to the Montana Supreme Court will be declared unconstitutional.   It's hard to imagine that we live in a time when corporations enjoy the rights and privileges of citizens, with none of the legal responsibilities that we assume as human beings. I'm proud that Montana is willing to stand up and say this situation is wrong-headed and potentially dangerous.

http://readersupportednews.org/news-section2/341-193/10915-supreme-court-agrees-to-hear-citizens-united-ii

 

Let's hold onto our capacity for reason and human decency during this upcoming flood.  We won't agree with our neighbors about everything, but we should be able to overcome toxic politics and retain our sense of Montana goodness.

 

 


--
David Graber
Hardin, MT  59034

graberd59034@hotmail.com
www.greenwoodfarmmt.org


Thursday, April 12, 2012

Recovering the common good in American capitalism


The moral principle of revolutions is to instruct, not to destroy. -Thomas Paine, "First Principles of Government," 1795.

 

I think most of us would agree that capitalism is a pretty good economic system. Free markets create wealth, which makes a higher standard of living for us all. I can't help but wonder, though, about when pure capitalism conflicts with the common good. There seems to be an inherent tension between our natural instincts to acquiring as much wealth and power as possible and taking care of each other.

 

I learned my own lessons about this conflict as a youngster, back in the 50's. My parents decided to pull out a little capitalism, in order to encourage us kids to be more efficient in our work. We could earn one cent for every ten sour dock weeds we pulled from the oats field. Earning some money was unprecedented and we were excited. My brother and I dove into our work enthusiastically. We were going to earn our own money! It became quickly apparent that I was going to earn much more than my little brother. After all, I was taller, stronger, and had longer arms than he did. Why shouldn't I get paid more? His frustration at not having a fair chance to compete with me was overwhelming and his reaction was an outright tantrum.

 

As he flailed about on the ground, I heaped insult to his injured pride by nudging him with my booted toe telling him to quit smashing the grain. He jumped up and ran shouting, "I'll tell Mama!" I reminded him that Mama's gone with Dad to town. I probably added "Ha ha!" He was instantly down in the oats again, smashing another patch, screaming, kicking and crying.

 

I hadn't really done anything wrong, and yet somehow this situation really pulled at my conscience over the years. My little brother was enraged and humiliated (much to my amusement at the time) when all I was doing was following my parents' rules of economic engagement. I couldn't shake off the fact that my longer legs and sharper view of those sour docks were the means of out-competing my little brother for sour dock weeds. And I eventually remembered how Mom required me to open my gunny sack and divide my weed stalks to supplement my little brother's paltry collection before Dad came in from plowing corn and passed out the pennies. I was obedient; I was learning that supporting my brother was somehow more important than my own personal gain.

 

Fast forward a few years to my next lesson in the common good. Throughout our childhoods, we had no allowance, just a dime or two to spend when we were privileged to go to town with our parents. No one in my family was a stranger to hard work. Even us kids worked from sunup to sundown, by the time we were 11 or 12. I just accepted it as part of our good life in the country. Then I had a conversation at my eighth grade graduation with another rural student from a wealthier family. He got what he called an allowance, far more than I could imagine, and every time he worked he was paid personally. This to me was almost beyond belief. In my family, we almost never possessed money of our own.

 

So that spring, armed with this information proving how weird my parents were for making us work so hard for nothing, I tried repeatedly to persuade Mom we should be paid. Mom said we were paid well: a place to sleep, food to eat, clothes to wear, hunting and fishing in season, barrel staves to fashion into skis if we had the courage to use them on our steep bluffs, a free swimming hole in the creek, etc. She added that I should talk to Dad. He added that work was a privilege to contribute to the whole family's survival, like he and Mom did. He seemed to really appreciate my maturity to bear my share of the work to make our farm prosper for our family. I didn't get anywhere with my child labor protest. If only I had known that my parents were so un-American. Imagine working for the common good, rather than my own personal benefit!

 

Decades later I discovered the democracy-building conflict at the heart of our American capitalism. On the one hand, we are all subject to greedy impulses for power and money. On the other hand, we are all created to look out for the common good in all our enterprises. Adam Smith, our philosophical founder of American capitalism, did not settle this conflict in favor of greed. That false understanding is the fallacy of the new American capitalism currently destroying our wealth as a nation.

 

Jesus actually had quite a bit to say about this conflict in His time, though I've never heard anyone call him a "socialist." What I began learning in the 50's is now almost totally unlearned on Wall Street. The American values of capitalism so strongly held by my parents and millions of other American farm families then, who knew their prosperity was founded on their attention to the common good, are almost gone now in favor of a kind of laissez faire capitalism that contradicts the Bible and would make our Constitution writers turn over in their graves.

 

But don't take my word for it.

 

See the following links on writings by Stacy Mitchell on Big Banks, by Alexander Eichler on Wall Street and mental health, by George Monbiot of "The Guardian" on the industrial psychopathology of the wealthiest one percent that is bankrupting us all, and a summary of revolutionary instruction based on The Bible, Thomas Paine and Adam Smith now needed in America, not published in my column.

 

"Banking used to be an agreement between neighbors, not a transaction between chairmen of the board. It's time for a new set of rules—banking policies for the 99 percent."

http://www.newrules.org/banking/news/banking-rest-us

 

 

"Twenty eight stockbrokers participated in various simulations and intelligence tests, and then compared their results to a group of psychopaths. (It was) found that the traders showed a higher degree of competitiveness than the psychopaths -- and that the traders were surprisingly willing to cause harm to their competitors if they thought it would bring them an advantage."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/09/26/stockbroker-psychopath_n_981950.html

 

Here's George Monbiot of The Guardian on the wealthiest one percent: "Our common treasury in the last 30 years has been captured by industrial psychopaths. That's why we're nearly bankrupt. If wealth were the inevitable result of hard work and enterprise, every woman in Africa would be a millionaire. The claims that the ultra-rich 1% make for themselves – that they are possessed of unique intelligence or creativity or drive – are examples of the self-attribution fallacy. This means crediting yourself with outcomes for which you weren't responsible." http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/nov/07/one-per-cent-wealth-destroyers

 

Here's a summary of the evidence supporting revolutionary instruction for America, now more relevant than ever:

http://truth-out.org/index.php?option=com_k2&view=item&id=7300:occupying-democracy-a-moral-revolution-for-social-justice

 

There we were, sixty years ago, in our parents' experiment with a cultivated greed economy set up especially for us children. On that day it backfired. But to resolve things, I ended up having to share half my weeds with my little brother. Now the same thing is backfiring for our American wealth today. Problem is, who of the 99% will take authority vested by our constitution to insist that our banks, brokers and the wealthy one percent return to our foundational capitalist principles?

 

We the 99% haven't fulfilled our management role as governors of the people, by the people, and for the people to make sure these top players in the money game follow our original capitalist philosophy. That's what's wrong with Romneycare, Obamacare, and whatever Teapartycare would look like if they ever get the chance at setting up the game. That's what's right about the core

 

 

The Bible: document the common good of money. Parable of the grape harvesters.

 

And I've been part of a family effort to form a little economic incentive to get some work out of my grandchildren.  We have rocks in the garden and lawn needing to be picked up. Toy dump trucks and little red wagons were deployed. Negotiation began over how many rocks brought to the rock pile were worth a dollar. Arguments ensued over compensation for bigger rocks vs. pebbles. Then came the compensation argument over one child's rocks laboriously hauled from the far corner of the lawn vs. rocks found near the pile and ceremoniously tossed on. The profits for this entrepreneurial child piled enormously faster. Complexities and charges of unfairness soon rivaled Wall Street hedge funds.

 

Soon we parents and grandparents spoiled the profit fun. We applied the adult principle of having one economy: the common good of the family. But the challenge of getting more does build problem-solving skills in math and in negotiation. So we will relegate this separate child-centered economy to easily observable jobs where counting of product can be compensated and collaboration is less important.

 

It got me thinking about how I learned to handle money. I remember back in the 40's only one time I was given money for work done. There was no "allowance." My parents kept a penny jar.  Oats fields were vulnerable to sour dock weeds. Dad needed to go to town. Mom didn't want the children hanging around with nothing to do. We each were handed a gunnysack and sent to the oats field nearest the house, past the penny jar on the top shelf by the door. The promise was ten weeds for a penny. I had visions of chewing gum and dairy queen. The acquisition instinct kept us busy for more than an hour, and the fields provided several summer mornings of labor with minimal parent supervision.

 

But feeding and watering livestock and poultry, weeding the garden, shoveling manure out of sheds, milking the cows and countless other tasks were compensated for by the common good. It was enough to know 

 

The old tax system was transparent. By April 15, those of us working for a living knew how much we paid in taxes. We didn't like it then, and still don't. But we knew our taxes then. Now we don't.

 

The new tax system robs us blind, imposed not by democratic government edict, but by plutocratic corporate stealth. It began when we ignored a vital cause of our own revolution at our nation's birth:  The history of British government, in collusion with the East India Tea Company, believed in unrestrained global laissez faire economics. They tried to squelch private commerce in the tea market of our thirteen colonies. Colonists said no, and organized the original Boston Tea Party.  It was successful.

 

Now we again have legal theft via extraction of huge amounts of money from millions of people at small amounts. We need another Tea Party.  

 

First of all, see where our money concentrates.

 

Forbes Magazine just released a story on the top forty hedge fund operatives of 2011.

 

http://www.alternet.org/world/154671/A_Single_Hedge-Fund_Hustler_Makes_More_Than_85%2C000_Teachers%3A_Why_Are_Our_Priorities_So_Messed_Up%3F/

 

http://www.forbes.com/sites/nathanvardi/2012/03/01/the-40-highest-earning-hedge-fund-managers-3/

 

Last of all, read the Bible. Passages where the primary agenda is economics as a moral choice far outnumber those passages that focus on religion or theology. Unfortunately, along with me and me parents, we have been taught to read even the explicitly economics passages through our learned lens of religion. Start with Jesus' "Sermon on the Mount" Matthew 5-7. Note that this passage was paramount as a literal guide for life for Christians in the first three centuries. They did not interpret it away as for another time or dispensation.


--
David Graber
RR 1 Box 1211D
631 Woodley Ln
Hardin, MT  59034

406 665-3373
www.greenwoodfarmmt.org
Bonnie's email graberbj@gmail.com